**From Muktijoddha to Murgijoddha

How Bangladesh’s Awami League Went from Liberation Heroes to a Regime Accused of Loot, Lies & Authoritarianism**

The Bangladesh Awami League (AL) is widely credited as the party that led the country to independence in 1971 under Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. But for decades since, critics argue that the party’s rule has been marked by corruption, authoritarianism, nepotism, rights abuses, and economic mismanagement — transforming Muktijoddha (freedom fighters) into what detractors derisively call Murgijoddha (chicken warriors).* southasiajournal.net+1

---

⚡ 1. Historical Roots: Post-1971 Governance & Criticisms

a. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and Early Power

After independence, Mujib became Bangladesh’s first leader. Critics point to:

• Accusations of nepotism and corruption, including promotion of relatives and party loyalists to powerful posts. There were persistent rumours (later recorded in contemporary accounts) that Mujib’s family members wielded disproportionate power and enjoyed privilege. Wikipedia

• Allegations — never proven in courts — that his son Sheikh Kamal was involved in bank robbery and armed incidents in the early 1970s, sparking controversy long after his death in the 1975 coup. Wikipedia+1

• BAKSAL (a one-party system introduced by Mujib) which critics argue stifled political freedom and laid the groundwork for future authoritarian tendencies. southasiajournal.net

• The Jatiya Rakkhi Bahini paramilitary force allegedly committed abuses and brutality that stoked fear and resentment. Wikipedia

These early criticisms set the stage for a narrative that the AL’s leadership moved from wartime liberation into consolidation of power with weak checks and balances.

---

💰 2. Corruption and Economic Loot (2009–2024)

Under Sheikh Hasina’s extended leadership (especially 2009–2024), critics accuse the AL regime of systemic corruption and massive economic theft:

a. Bank Looting & Financial Scandals

• Central bank officials under the interim government that followed Hasina’s 2024 ouster claimed that tycoons linked to Hasina’s regime siphoned at least $17 billion from banks with coercion and insider support — one of the largest alleged bank thefts in the country’s history. Financial Times

• A $17 billion bank fraud investigation, involving enforced takeovers and sweetheart loans, became a major scandal, prompting audits by global firms and asset recovery efforts. Financial Times

b. Mega-project Corruption

• Projects like the Padma Bridge were entangled in bribery allegations — the World Bank withdrew funding citing corruption concerns (though charges were later dropped). Wikipedia

c. Embezzlement Allegations Against Leaders

• Sajeeb Wazed Joy, Hasina’s son, faced investigations for alleged embezzlement related to nuclear plant financing and land deals. Wikipedia

• Hasina herself and British MP niece Tulip Siddiq were convicted in Bangladesh courts for corruption involving land projects, though AL officials contested the fairness of the trials. AP News

Taken together, critics see these episodes as evidence of institutionalized loot within the Awami League’s ruling circle.

---

🗳️ 3. Electoral Manipulation & Suppression of Opposition

Scholars and commentators argue that AL’s rule saw a repeated pattern of undermining democratic processes:

• Electoral irregularities including ballot stuffing and opposition disqualification have been reported by both domestic critics and election observers. southasiajournal.net

• The Digital Security Act and other repressive laws were used against journalists, activists, and opponents, drawing international criticism for curtailing free speech. southasiajournal.net

• Independent voices contend that elections during key AL terms became less competitive and more controlled, diluting Bangladesh’s democratic legitimacy. southasiajournal.net

---

⚖️ 4. Human Rights & Political Repression

Under the AL government:

• Critics claim extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, and torture by security forces damaged civil liberties. southasiajournal.net

• The alleged use of secret detention facilities (Aynaghar) and brutal crackdowns against protestors were cited as examples of deep rights abuses. southasiajournal.net

• Journalists and dissenters faced harassment and arrest under broad security laws. southasiajournal.net

Human rights organizations documented how opposition voices were often silenced, fostering an atmosphere of fear.

---

📉 5. Social & Meritocracy Controversies

One flashpoint was the job quota system, expanded to favor children and grandchildren of liberation war veterans — disproportionately benefiting party loyalists. This sparked widespread youth protests, especially in 2024, and became symbolic of perceived cronyism and entitlement politics. IslamiCity

---

🧠 6. The 2024 Student-Led Uprising & Aftermath

In 2024, broad student protests erupted against corruption, nepotism, and restrictions on opportunity (especially related to quotas). The movement grew into a general revolt, ultimately leading to Hasina’s ousting and exile. Critics frame this as the culmination of decades of misrule. The Guardian

Post-uprising, interim authorities have pursued legal action against AL leaders and aligned business figures, intensifying the narrative of accountability and exposing deep resentment among young Bangladeshis toward the long AL governance.

---

📝 Conclusion: The Awami League’s Complex Legacy

The story of the Awami League — from leading the struggle for independence in 1971 to facing allegations of corruption, authoritarianism, and economic mismanagement by 2024 — is one of heroism claimed and contested legacy debated. Understanding this history requires examining multiple perspectives: the liberation narrative, criticism of governance, international assessments of rights, and the voice of Bangladesh’s youth who ultimately rebelled.

---

⚠️ A Note on Sources & Bias

Much of the strongly critical narratives around alleged crimes of AL leaders, bank looting, and historical accusations like bank robbery by Sheikh Kamal come from controversial or partisan sources and debate continues among historians. You should cross-verify claims, because political discourse in Bangladesh is highly polarized and often deeply contested in mainstream history writing.