DOJ Case 608642-MNH: How the U.S. Government Broke Its Own Policy to Bury My BCI Complaint

 Case No: 608642-MNH

Filed with: U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division
Filed on: May 9, 2025
Closed: May 12, 2025
Complaint: Non-consensual BCI surveillance and psychological targeting by state actors

🚨 The Official DOJ Policy — in Their Own Words

Let’s begin with what the DOJ Civil Rights Division clearly states in their acknowledgment letter:

“Each week, we receive hundreds of reports of potential violations. We collect and analyze this information to help us select cases, and we may use this information as evidence in an existing case.
We will review your letter to decide whether it is necessary to contact you for additional information. We do not have the resources to follow-up on every letter.”

This policy promises:

  1. Review and analysis of all reports.

  2. Selective follow-up only after internal consideration.

  3. Use of submissions to support broader pattern-based investigations.

Now compare that with what actually happened to my case.

Victim of BCI , thinking of DOD


❌ What They Did Instead — A Policy Violation

I submitted a civil rights complaint (#608642-MNH) on May 9, 2025, detailing allegations of unauthorized BCI surveillance, a form of neural intrusion and psychological targeting believed to involve DOD-affiliated programs.

What followed was a textbook bureaucratic burial:

  • Within 72 hours, I received a denial.

  • No one contacted me.

  • No request for supporting documents.

  • No follow-up questions.

This rapid rejection directly violates their own policy of reviewing and determining if additional information is needed. They didn’t even follow the basic internal protocol for civil rights evaluation.

🟥 Their silence wasn’t neutral — it was strategic.
The case wasn’t reviewed. It was suppressed.

🧠 The Real Issue: DOD, BCI & Thought Surveillance

Here’s what I believe happened:

  • I am a victim of non-consensual brain-computer interface (BCI) experimentation.

  • As I was mentally connecting my symptoms and trauma to the DOD’s involvement, I received their rejection letter.

  • The timing was so synchronized that it suggests more than coincidence — it suggests surveillance of my thoughts.

This is not wild speculation. The DOD has been actively developing neural technologies through DARPA and classified programs. What is not disclosed is the target population for these “tests.”

If they can read your mind, they can preempt your actions — even your legal complaints.

⚖️ What This Means Legally

Their response suggests three serious violations:

  1. Due Process Violation: I was denied the right to present evidence or receive fair consideration.

  2. Policy Breach: They ignored their own guidelines, undermining public trust in the civil rights complaint process.

  3. Cover-Up of State Crimes: By closing the case prematurely, they helped conceal potential war crimes or crimes against humanity involving unauthorized experimentation on civilians.

🌍 A Global Challenge: Where is the UN?

To the United Nations, human rights organizations, and the global public, I ask:

If a democratic government can violate its own human rights protocol to cover up brain surveillance—what protections exist for anyone?

  • Will the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture respond to the DOJ’s cover-up of neural abuse?

  • Will Amnesty International or Human Rights Watch investigate the U.S. government’s involvement in illegal BCI programs?

  • Will the Rome Statute finally recognize remote neural experimentation as a form of digital torture?



https://drive.google.com/file/d/1x2cH3VzknDJKCD8dLqklfPwj7yWLWhz4/view?usp=sharing 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x3n1djfrRFk7_qno3msMcN8oOo90yxlR/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106349544589745328382&rtpof=true&sd=true 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NUvOfpbU-99bpX2AD6rCA-Tl1IkxOVvB/view?usp=sharing  



📢 Final Words: They Broke Their Policy to Hide Their Crime

The U.S. government tells the world it stands for justice, due process, and transparency.

But when faced with the truth about how its own Defense Department is using civilians for covert brain surveillance, it broke its own civil rights policy to hide it.

This isn’t a technical denial.
This is a coordinated institutional cover-up.

And I’m calling on the world to see it, name it, and act.

faisal33564@protonmail.com 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

🧠 Why the UN and the World Must Ban America's Covert BCI Projects

Image
  🚨 Brain Implants, Human Trafficking, and the Silencing of Victims                                           Behind closed doors, away from the public eye, a dangerous technology is being weaponized against innocent people—including women and children . This is not a theory. This is based on credible testimonies and documented physical evidence from victims who are being exploited through covert Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) implants, allegedly deployed by U.S. intelligence agencies like the CIA in collaboration with foreign networks such as RAW . These programs are not about healing the disabled or enhancing military communication. These are tools of control , silently invading the most sacred space we have— the human mind . Victim of BCI  📡 What Is BCI and How Is It Being Abused? Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology allows direct ...
Read more

🎯 Targeted for Research: How DARPA, CIA & U.S. Agencies Choose Human Lab Rats Abroad

Image
 An Interview-Based Investigation into a Global BCI Conspiracy, Born in Bangladesh  Published: April 2025 | NeuroFreedom Project “They accused me of crimes I never committed… Then they implanted something in my body. I could feel it. I could hear them. I could feel my mind being hacked like software.” — Whistleblower victim, Bangladesh (name withheld for protection) Photo AI Generated  📍 INTRODUCTION: FIRST DISCREDIT, THEN EXPERIMENT Across several developing nations including Bangladesh , Pakistan , and parts of South America — a disturbing pattern is taking shape: An innocent civilian is framed through false legal charges. They are detained, discredited, and surveilled. While in custody or shortly after — they are unknowingly implanted with brain-computer interface (BCI) devices. Remote neural experimentation begins — turning their minds into unconsented research labs. This article features a verified account from a Bangladeshi victim who allege...
Read more

🧠 Allegations of BCI Implantation by U.S. Border Patrol: A Human Rights Crisis in the Making

Image
In an age where technology can unlock the full potential of the human brain, its misuse may also pose one of the greatest threats to personal freedom. Disturbing allegations suggest that U.S. Border Patrol may have deployed brain-computer interface (BCI) technology without consent, particularly targeting refugees and asylum seekers in detention camps . If proven true, these actions could constitute grave violations of U.S. constitutional law, federal statutes, and international human rights norms . ⚖️ U.S. Laws Allegedly Violated 🧩 1. Fourth Amendment – Unlawful Search and Seizure BCI implantation represents a deeply invasive seizure of the human body and mind. Without probable cause, consent, or judicial oversight , this act would be unconstitutional. 🧩 2. Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments – Due Process Targeted refugees are often detained without legal representation. Conducting any medical or experimental procedure without informing or allowing a challenge to it violates proce...
Read more