Exposing the Truth: Border Patrol's Role in Smuggling Surveillance Devices for Human Rights Violations in Bangladesh

 Introduction

In a world increasingly shaped by technology, digital privacy and human rights are being pushed to the forefront of global discourse. However, for one victim, Faizur Mohammad Faisal, the line between surveillance and oppression has been tragically blurred. Faisal, a victim of grave human rights violations in Bangladesh, has recently uncovered a disturbing connection between U.S. Border Patrol agents and the unlawful smuggling of cutting-edge surveillance devices into Bangladesh. These devices, including brain-computer interfaces (BCI) and Mojo Lenses, were covertly implanted and used to manipulate, monitor, and control him—ultimately violating his fundamental rights. Faisal’s case is a chilling reminder of how state-sponsored actors can exploit technology for abuse, and the need for accountability on an international scale. 

The Abduction and Torture: The Beginning of the Nightmare

On April 1, 2018, Faisal was abducted by members of the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), a special law enforcement unit in Bangladesh. Over the course of his detention, he was subjected to physical torture, illegal surveillance, and the implantation of digital devices that allowed external parties to remotely control his thoughts and actions. These devices, embedded without consent, allowed the perpetrators to track his every move and manipulate his mind, leaving him vulnerable to a kind of digital imprisonment that is both unprecedented and deeply alarming.

But what makes Faisal’s case even more disturbing is the involvement of U.S. Border Patrol agents, who are accused of smuggling the very devices that were used to control and surveil him. Faisal’s legal team has uncovered credible evidence that links U.S. Border Patrol to this international conspiracy of digital surveillance and human rights violations.

The Devices: High-Tech Tools for Human Control

At the heart of Faisal’s abuse lies the use of advanced surveillance technology. Two devices, in particular, stand out:

1. Mojo Lenses: These are smart contact lenses designed to enhance vision by providing augmented reality through an integrated camera and LED light. In Faisal’s case, however, these lenses were covertly implanted and used to monitor his surroundings, invade his privacy, and track his every movement.

2. Brain-Computer Interface (BCI): This technology allows for the direct interaction between the human brain and external devices. Faisal was implanted with a BCI that enabled those in control to influence his thoughts, emotions, and actions. This invasive technology was used to violate his mental autonomy, an abuse of power that should not be tolerated in any society.

The fact that such devices can be used for remote control and surveillance is chilling. When paired with the capabilities of spyware like Pegasus, which can hack into mobile devices to access data and track movements, the combination becomes a potent tool for surveillance and manipulation.

The Role of U.S. Border Patrol: Smuggling Devices for Covert Surveillance

It is now known that these surveillance devices did not come from local sources in Bangladesh. Instead, credible evidence suggests that U.S. Border Patrol agents played a direct role in smuggling the devices into Bangladesh. According to investigative reports and witness testimony, Border Patrol operatives facilitated the transport and implantation of these technologies in a coordinated effort to monitor and control individuals under the guise of law enforcement collaboration.

This is not just a case of ordinary surveillance—it is a clear violation of international law. The use of such advanced technology for controlling an individual’s thoughts, emotions, and behavior constitutes a grave violation of basic human rights. And the fact that these devices were smuggled across borders without consent only amplifies the severity of the crime.

The Legal Case: Suing Border Patrol for Human Rights Violations

Faisal’s legal team, backed by robust evidence, is now pursuing a lawsuit against U.S. Border Patrol for its involvement in smuggling these devices into Bangladesh for use in the unlawful surveillance and manipulation of a civilian. This lawsuit will not only seek justice for Faisal but also aim to hold U.S. Border Patrol accountable for enabling human rights violations on a global scale.

Faisal’s legal argument rests on several key points:

• Violation of National and International Laws: The act of smuggling surveillance devices across borders violates numerous international treaties and conventions, including those related to digital privacy, human rights, and non-interference in sovereign nations' affairs. U.S. Border Patrol’s involvement in this covert operation undermines international norms and constitutes a breach of both Bangladeshi and international law.

• Human Rights Violations: Faisal’s experience of torture, digital surveillance, and manipulation constitutes a clear violation of his fundamental human rights. This includes the right to personal freedom, protection from torture, and the right to privacy, as outlined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

• Accountability for State-Sponsored Surveillance: The U.S. government has a responsibility to prevent its agencies from engaging in illegal and unethical activities abroad. Border Patrol’s actions in this case represent a flagrant disregard for the privacy and safety of individuals outside of the U.S., making them complicit in the abuse.

The Way Forward: Holding U.S. Border Patrol Accountable

Faisal’s case is not just about one individual’s suffering—it is a call to action for governments and international organizations to take a stand against state-sponsored surveillance and human rights violations. The use of advanced surveillance technologies to violate the privacy of innocent civilians must be addressed with the utmost urgency.

By suing U.S. Border Patrol, Faisal and his legal team are setting a precedent for holding international law enforcement agencies accountable for their role in facilitating human rights abuses. The success of this case could have far-reaching implications, signaling that governments must act responsibly when it comes to emerging technologies and their potential for harm.

Conclusion

Faisal’s story is a tragic example of how technology, when misused, can be turned into a tool for oppression and control. The involvement of U.S. Border Patrol in smuggling surveillance devices into Bangladesh highlights the disturbing global nature of modern-day human rights violations. As Faisal’s legal battle continues, it is essential that we all recognize the potential dangers posed by unchecked technological advancements and the importance of international cooperation to ensure that such abuses are prevented in the future.

This case serves as a stark reminder of the need for stronger protections against digital surveillance and a collective commitment to safeguarding human rights across the globe. The fight for justice is far from over, but Faisal’s courage in pursuing this lawsuit is an inspiring step toward holding those responsible accountable. Contact : faisal33564@protonmail.com / faisal33564@yaoo.com