DARPA’s “Broomstick” & Mojo Lens “Witch”: When Black Magic Becomes Real Tech
Why Covert BCI & AR Lens Experiments Must Be Investigated as Crimes Against Humanity
🕯️ Introduction: Techno-Witchcraft Disguised as Innovation
Imagine a world where “magic” is no longer folklore — but science. DARPA’s brain-computer interface (BCI) programs, often nicknamed “Broomstick” for their mind-controlling capabilities, and Mojo Vision’s augmented reality smart contact lenses — the so-called “Witch” — are no longer concepts from fiction. They are real. And worse — they may already be deployed covertly, without consent, and on innocent people, including children.
These aren’t just research projects. They are silent, invasive experiments in live environments — and one such alleged victim is now speaking out from Bangladesh, bringing terrifying evidence that could unravel a global human rights nightmare.
🧠 BCI: DARPA’s Broomstick Program and the Power to Hack the Mind
DARPA’s BCI initiatives were initially framed as a noble mission: helping paralyzed individuals regain control of prosthetics, or allowing soldiers to silently communicate using thought. But beyond these headlines lies a darker application — neuro-surveillance and manipulation.
Sources like The New Yorker and Wired describe DARPA’s investments in “adaptive neural interfaces” and “smart war stations,” which could eventually allow military systems to read — and potentially influence — a human’s thoughts in real time (New Yorker, Wired).
But what happens when the experiment leaves the lab — and targets civilians?
👁️ Mojo Vision: The Witch Lens That Sees You
The “Mojo Lens” offers to place augmented reality inside your eye — merging digital data with your natural field of view. But this vision-enhancing tech can easily become a surveillance device. With the capacity to record, transmit, and analyze your visual environment silently, it’s not just enhancing your sight — it could be watching for the state.
These smart lenses could theoretically send telemetry, detect pupil dilation and gaze, or even inject subliminal cues. Now imagine this technology used covertly — without your knowledge or consent.
🚨 A Real Victim in Bangladesh: The Hidden Horror of Techno-Surveillance
A whistleblower in Bangladesh claims to be a victim of covert BCI and AR lens experimentation by intelligence-linked actors. His case, supported by an RF (radio frequency) signal detection test, shows severe and persistent RF emissions from his left eye and ear — strongly indicating an implanted or wearable device transmitting data.
He describes how his life was turned into a psychological warfare experiment — referencing DARPA’s “broomstick” mind-reading tech and the eye-based “witch” lens — used not for treatment or defense, but surveillance, control, and trauma.
Children and innocent men, he says, were targeted and implanted like guinea pigs. No consent. No oversight. Only abuse.
❓The Big Question: Who Are DARPA and CIA Experimenting On?
-
Who are the real “subjects” of these programs?
-
Are “third-world” populations being used as expendable test beds?
-
Is this what “technological superiority” looks like in the 21st century — covert war on the human mind?
This isn’t conspiracy — this is biometric imperialism, conducted behind the veil of research grants, military contracts, and private innovation.
⚖️ Ethical Catastrophe: Why This Is a Crime Against Humanity
Under international human rights law, involuntary experimentation — especially involving neural or bodily implants — is illegal. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court prohibits medical experiments without consent as crimes against humanity. So does the Nuremberg Code. So does the U.S. Constitution — at least in theory.
Yet if DARPA, CIA proxies, or private contractors are exporting BCI tech into unregulated environments (like Bangladesh or elsewhere), they are committing not just moral violations — but global crimes.
🛑 Close the Witch & Broomstick Programs — Before It’s Too Late
These technologies must be audited, restricted, and brought under transparent global oversight. Independent medical and technological inspection bodies must be allowed to investigate all claims of unauthorized implantation and covert neural or ocular surveillance — especially from whistleblowers like the Bangladeshi victim.
Comments
Post a Comment